3 Shops · 0+ Products
GUMILAB.EU

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 7

Firestone Roadhawkвисш среден клас
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich Advantageвисш среден клас
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Брой тестове
21
14
3
26
Best position
#2
#8
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
13.4
3.3
2.2
най-нов тест
2024
2026
2026
2026
налични размери
164
153
40
66

мокър

мокър
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
аквапланинг - кръст
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
спиране на мокра настилка
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
мокра обработка
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
водач от мократа страна
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
мокро сцепление
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

сух

сух
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
сухо спиране
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
обработка в сухо състояние
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
поведение при шофиране на сухо
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Сухо представяне
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
реакция на сухо управление
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

комфорт

комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
външен шум
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
вътрешен шум
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

разходи

разходи
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
пробег
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
цена/стойност
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
горивна ефективност
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение