3 магазини · 0+ продукти

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Брой тестове
6
18
5
1
4
3
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
4.7
6.1
2.8
1.0
3.3
3.7
най-нов тест
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
налични размери
146
47
139
66
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
аквапланинг - кръст
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
спиране на мокра настилка
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
мокра обработка
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
сух
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
обработка в сухо състояние
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
сухо спиране
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
външен шум
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
разходи
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
пробег
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

ВЗЕМИ

GumiLab.eu

Безплатно — в App Store

Сравнете гуми, прочетете тестови резултати и намерете най-добрите цени — всичко в едно приложение.

Виж в App Store