сравнение: CST Medallion MD-A1 срещу. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

CST

Medallion MD-A1

R13 – R20

VS

висш среден клас

Kleber

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Medallion MD-A1

Dynaxer HP4

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Брой тестове

2

11

3

1

4

Best position

#10

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

21.5

11.6

3.7

1.0

3.3

най-нов тест

2019

2024

2025

2026

налични размери

264

122

36

66

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

мокър

Confidence

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

аквапланинг - кръст

CST Medallion MD-A1

87%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

спиране на мокра настилка

CST Medallion MD-A1

29%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

CST Medallion MD-A1

99%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Завиване в мокър кръг

CST Medallion MD-A1

24%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

мокра обработка

CST Medallion MD-A1

88%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

сух

Confidence

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

сухо спиране

CST Medallion MD-A1

22%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

обработка в сухо състояние

CST Medallion MD-A1

95%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

разходи

Confidence

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

съпротивление при търкаляне

CST Medallion MD-A1

70%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

комфорт

Confidence

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

външен шум

CST Medallion MD-A1

100%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

Разгледай класациите

Best tyres for evs Най-добрите гуми за работа на сухо Най-добрите гуми за дъжд за гуми с най-добро управление Най-тихите гуми за най-икономичните гуми за най-добрите гуми против аквапланинг

Сравнете също

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Maxxis Premitra HP5

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Разгледай по марка

GT

сравнение: CST Medallion MD-A1 срещу. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Medallion MD-A1

Dynaxer HP4

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

размери и цени

Разгледай класациите

Популярни сравнения на гуми

Сравнете също

Разгледай по марка

добавете към сравнението