сравнение: Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Kumho Ecsta PS71 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Continental

PremiumContact 7

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Брой тестове

26

3

15

1

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

2.2

3.3

9.0

1.0

3.7

най-нов тест

2026

2025

налични размери

66

40

225

64

34

мокър

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

спиране на мокра настилка

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

мокра обработка

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

аквапланинг - кръст

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

сух

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

обработка в сухо състояние

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

сухо спиране

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

разходи

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

пробег

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

цена/стойност

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

комфорт

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

комфорт

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

външен шум

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

вътрешен шум

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Kumho Ecsta PS71 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

мокър

сух

разходи

комфорт

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението