3 Shops · 0+ Products
GUMILAB.EU

сравнение: Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52висш среден клас
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.Ziexвисш среден клас
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
26
3
10
3
1
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Average position
2.2
3.3
6.0
3.7
1.0
най-нов тест
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
налични размери
66
40
104
34
64

мокър

мокър
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
спиране на мокра настилка
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
мокра обработка
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
аквапланинг - кръст
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

сух

сух
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
обработка в сухо състояние
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
смяна на лентата на движение на сухо
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

разходи

разходи
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
пробег
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
цена/стойност
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

комфорт

комфорт
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
комфорт
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
външен шум
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение