сравнение: Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE320 срещу. Bridgestone Turanza 6 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Continental

PremiumContact 7

VS

Also compare with

Pilot Sport 5

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

PremiumContact 7

Roadhawk 2

ZIEX ZE320

Turanza 6

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Брой тестове

26

6

5

13

10

3

Best position

#1

#3

#2

Average position

2.2

4.7

6.4

6.2

6.0

3.3

най-нов тест

2026

налични размери

66

146

43

225

104

60

мокър

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

82%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

74%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

спиране на мокра настилка

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

82%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

мокра обработка

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

98%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

аквапланинг - кръст

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

66%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

73%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

сух

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

84%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

обработка в сухо състояние

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

80%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

сухо спиране

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

87%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

82%

разходи

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

72%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

83%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

пробег

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

56%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

цена/стойност

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

61%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

54%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

комфорт

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

58%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

комфорт

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

79%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

външен шум

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken ZIEX ZE320

82%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Continental PremiumContact 7 срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Falken ZIEX ZE320 срещу. Bridgestone Turanza 6 срещу. Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Roadhawk 2

ZIEX ZE320

Turanza 6

Ecsta HS52

Ventus Evo

Test profile

мокър

сух

разходи

комфорт

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението