сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. Firestone Roadhawk срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

висш среден клас

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

WetProof

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Брой тестове

14

21

3

1

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

5.6

11.9

3.3

1.0

3.7

най-нов тест

2023

2024

2026

2025

налични размери

47

164

40

64

34

мокър

Nokian WetProof

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian WetProof

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian WetProof

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian WetProof

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

мокра обработка

Nokian WetProof

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Nokian WetProof

91%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

водач от мократа страна

Nokian WetProof

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

сух

Nokian WetProof

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

сухо спиране

Nokian WetProof

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian WetProof

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

поведение при шофиране на сухо

Nokian WetProof

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

реакция на сухо управление

Nokian WetProof

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

външен шум

Nokian WetProof

86%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

87%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

вътрешен шум

Nokian WetProof

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

разходи

Nokian WetProof

60%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian WetProof

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

пробег

Nokian WetProof

56%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

цена/стойност

Nokian WetProof

46%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. Firestone Roadhawk срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

WetProof

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението