сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Kumho Ecsta PS71 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

висш среден клас

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

WetProof

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Брой тестове

14

15

3

Best position

#1

#8

#2

Average position

5.6

13.4

9.0

3.3

най-нов тест

2023

2026

2025

2026

налични размери

47

153

225

40

мокър

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

мокра обработка

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

водач от мократа страна

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

мокро сцепление

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сух

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сухо спиране

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

поведение при шофиране на сухо

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Сухо представяне

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

външен шум

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

вътрешен шум

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

разходи

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

пробег

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

цена/стойност

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

горивна ефективност

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Kumho Ecsta PS71 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението