сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin Pilot Sport 5

висш среден клас

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Pilot Sport 5

Брой тестове

14

3

14

Best position

#1

#8

#2

#1

Average position

5.6

13.4

3.3

3.4

най-нов тест

2023

2026

налични размери

47

153

40

70

мокър

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

82%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

76%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

мокра обработка

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

73%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

88%

водач от мократа страна

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

мокро сцепление

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сух

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

сухо спиране

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

87%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

85%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

91%

поведение при шофиране на сухо

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

реакция на сухо управление

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

75%

Сухо представяне

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

73%

външен шум

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

68%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

78%

вътрешен шум

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

разходи

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

87%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

79%

пробег

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

97%

цена/стойност

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

79%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin Pilot Sport 5

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението