сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

висш среден клас

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Брой тестове

14

3

5

Best position

#1

#8

#2

#1

Average position

5.6

13.4

3.3

2.2

най-нов тест

2023

2026

2025

налични размери

47

153

40

63

мокър

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

мокра обработка

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

водач от мократа страна

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

мокро сцепление

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сух

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

сухо спиране

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

поведение при шофиране на сухо

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Сухо представяне

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

външен шум

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

вътрешен шум

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

разходи

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

пробег

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

цена/стойност

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението