сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

висш среден клас

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Брой тестове

14

3

Best position

#1

#8

#2

Average position

5.6

13.4

3.3

3.7

3.3

най-нов тест

2023

2026

2025

2026

налични размери

47

153

40

34

60

мокър

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

мокра обработка

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

водач от мократа страна

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

сух

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

сухо спиране

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

реакция на сухо управление

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

външен шум

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

разходи

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

пробег

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

цена/стойност

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението