сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

висш среден клас

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Брой тестове

14

3

1

Best position

#1

#8

#2

#1

Average position

5.6

13.4

3.3

3.7

1.0

най-нов тест

2023

2026

2025

налични размери

47

153

40

34

64

мокър

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

мокра обработка

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

водач от мократа страна

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

сух

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

сухо спиране

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

реакция на сухо управление

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

външен шум

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

разходи

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

пробег

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

цена/стойност

Nokian WetProof

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

WetProof

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението