сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

висш среден клас

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

WetProof

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Брой тестове

14

2

3

Best position

#1

#8

#1

#2

Average position

5.6

13.4

1.0

3.3

най-нов тест

2023

2026

2025

2026

налични размери

47

153

23

40

мокър

Nokian WetProof

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian WetProof

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian WetProof

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

мокра обработка

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Nokian WetProof

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

водач от мократа страна

Nokian WetProof

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

мокро сцепление

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сух

Nokian WetProof

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сухо спиране

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian WetProof

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

поведение при шофиране на сухо

Nokian WetProof

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

реакция на сухо управление

Nokian WetProof

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Сухо представяне

Nokian WetProof

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

външен шум

Nokian WetProof

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

вътрешен шум

Nokian WetProof

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

комфорт

Nokian WetProof

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

разходи

Nokian WetProof

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian WetProof

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

пробег

Nokian WetProof

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian WetProof срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението