сравнение: Nokian Powerproof 2 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

висш среден клас

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Powerproof 2

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

P Zero (PZ5)

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Брой тестове

2

4

18

2

3

1

3

Best position

#6

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

8.0

12.0

6.1

3.0

3.3

1.0

3.7

най-нов тест

2026

2025

2024

2026

2025

налични размери

91

111

47

17

40

64

34

мокър

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

спиране на мокра настилка

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

мокра обработка

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

аквапланинг - кръст

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

сух

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

сухо спиране

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

обработка в сухо състояние

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

комфорт

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

външен шум

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

разходи

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Nokian Powerproof 2 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Powerproof 2

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

P Zero (PZ5)

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението