сравнение: Michelin e.Primacy срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Брой тестове

4

3

1

3

2

Best position

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

3.3

1.0

3.3

1.0

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

111

40

64

60

23

мокър

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

спиране на мокра настилка

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

аквапланинг - кръст

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

мокра обработка

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

сух

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

сухо спиране

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

обработка в сухо състояние

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

комфорт

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

външен шум

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

комфорт

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

разходи

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

пробег

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Michelin e.Primacy срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението