сравнение: Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test profile

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Брой тестове

4

18

1

3

2

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.0

6.1

1.0

3.7

1.0

най-нов тест

2025

2024

2025

налични размери

111

47

64

34

23

мокър

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

спиране на мокра настилка

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

аквапланинг - кръст

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

мокра обработка

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

водач от мократа страна

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

сух

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

сухо спиране

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

обработка в сухо състояние

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

реакция на сухо управление

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

комфорт

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

външен шум

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

комфорт

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

разходи

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

пробег

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението