сравнение: Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Брой тестове

4

2

3

1

14

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.0

1.0

3.3

1.0

5.5

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

111

23

40

64

706

мокър

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

аквапланинг - кръст

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

спиране на мокра настилка

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

мокра обработка

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

сух

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

сухо спиране

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

обработка в сухо състояние

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

реакция на сухо управление

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

смяна на лентата на движение на сухо

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

комфорт

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

външен шум

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

комфорт

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

разходи

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

пробег

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението