сравнение: Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Michelin

CrossClimate 3 Sport

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

CrossClimate 3 Sport

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Брой тестове

2

3

5

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

4.5

3.3

2.2

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

32

40

60

63

мокър

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

спиране на мокра настилка

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

мокра обработка

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

аквапланинг - кръст

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

сняг

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

87%

разходи

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

пробег

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

сух

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

сухо спиране

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

обработка в сухо състояние

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

комфорт

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

външен шум

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

комфорт

Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

CrossClimate 3 Sport

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

мокър

сняг

разходи

сух

комфорт

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението