3 Shops · 0+ Products

сравнение: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
3
3
3
1
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
4.0
3.3
3.7
1.0
най-нов тест
2026
2026
2025
2025
налични размери
54
40
34
64

мокър

мокър
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - кръст
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
спиране на мокра настилка
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
мокра обработка
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

сух

сух
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

комфорт

комфорт
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

разходи

разходи
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение