сравнение: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo

висш среден клас

Kumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

VS

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

Брой тестове

3

6

1

Best position

#1

#3

#1

Average position

4.0

4.7

1.0

най-нов тест

2026

2025

налични размери

54

146

64

мокър

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

мокра обработка

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

аквапланинг - кръст

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

спиране на мокра настилка

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

сух

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

сухо спиране

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

обработка в сухо състояние

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

комфорт

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

външен шум

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

разходи

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението