3 Shops · 0+ Products

сравнение: Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Брой тестове
10
6
1
3
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
4.7
1.0
3.7
най-нов тест
2026
2026
2025
2025
налични размери
104
146
64
34

мокър

мокър
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
спиране на мокра настилка
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
аквапланинг - кръст
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
мокра обработка
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

комфорт

комфорт
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
външен шум
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
комфорт
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

сух

сух
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
сухо спиране
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
обработка в сухо състояние
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

разходи

разходи
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
пробег
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение