3 Shops · 0+ Products

сравнение: Kumho Ecsta HS52 срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Continental SportContact 7

Test profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
SportContact 7
Брой тестове
10
6
15
Best position
#2
#3
#1
Average position
6.0
4.7
1.2
най-нов тест
2026
2026
2026
налични размери
104
146
122

мокър

мокър
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
спиране на мокра настилка
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
аквапланинг - кръст
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
мокра обработка
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental SportContact 7
86%

комфорт

комфорт
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
външен шум
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
комфорт
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

сух

сух
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
сухо спиране
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
обработка в сухо състояние
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental SportContact 7
94%

разходи

разходи
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
пробег
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение