сравнение: Hankook ION Evo срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

ION Evo

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Брой тестове

1

4

5

3

Best position

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

12.0

2.2

3.3

3.7

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

64

111

63

40

60

34

мокър

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

аквапланинг - кръст

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

спиране на мокра настилка

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

мокра обработка

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

разходи

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

пробег

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

комфорт

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

комфорт

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

външен шум

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

сух

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

сухо спиране

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

обработка в сухо състояние

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Hankook ION Evo срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

ION Evo

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

мокър

разходи

комфорт

сух

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението