сравнение: Hankook ION Evo срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Брой тестове

1

3

4

3

2

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

3.3

12.0

3.3

1.0

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

64

40

111

60

23

мокър

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

мокра обработка

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

аквапланинг - кръст

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

спиране на мокра настилка

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

разходи

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

пробег

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

комфорт

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

комфорт

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

външен шум

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

сух

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

сухо спиране

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

обработка в сухо състояние

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Hankook ION Evo срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

мокър

разходи

комфорт

сух

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението