сравнение: Hankook ION Evo срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Брой тестове

1

18

4

2

3

Best position

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

6.1

12.0

1.0

3.3

най-нов тест

2025

2024

2025

2026

налични размери

64

47

111

23

40

мокър

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

спиране на мокра настилка

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

мокра обработка

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

аквапланинг - кръст

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

разходи

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

пробег

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

комфорт

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

комфорт

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

външен шум

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

сух

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

сухо спиране

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

обработка в сухо състояние

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Hankook ION Evo срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

мокър

разходи

комфорт

сух

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението