3 Shops · 0+ Products

сравнение: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 6 срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
3
36
18
3
1
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
3.1
6.1
3.7
1.0
най-нов тест
2026
2023
2024
2025
2025
налични размери
40
296
47
34
64

мокър

мокър
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
спиране на мокра настилка
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
мокра обработка
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
аквапланинг - кръст
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Завиване в мокър кръг
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
водач от мократа страна
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

сух

сух
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
поведение при шофиране на сухо
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
смяна на лентата на движение на сухо
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
реакция на сухо управление
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

комфорт

комфорт
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
вътрешен шум
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

разходи

разходи
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
пробег
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
горивна ефективност
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение