сравнение: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Брой тестове

18

3

14

5

1

Best position

#1

#2

#8

#1

Average position

6.1

3.3

13.4

2.2

1.0

най-нов тест

2024

2026

2025

налични размери

47

60

153

63

64

мокър

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

мокра обработка

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

аквапланинг - кръст

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

спиране на мокра настилка

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

сух

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

сухо спиране

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

обработка в сухо състояние

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

комфорт

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

външен шум

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

комфорт

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

разходи

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

пробег

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

цена/стойност

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението