сравнение: Goodride Solmax 1 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Solmax 1

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Брой тестове

1

4

3

2

Best position

#8

#3

#2

#1

Average position

8.0

12.0

3.7

3.3

1.0

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

46

111

34

40

60

23

мокър

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

аквапланинг - кръст

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

спиране на мокра настилка

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

мокра обработка

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

разходи

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

пробег

Goodride Solmax 1

45%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

сух

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

сухо спиране

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

обработка в сухо състояние

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

комфорт

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

комфорт

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

външен шум

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Goodride Solmax 1 срещу. Michelin e.Primacy срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT

Solmax 1

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

мокър

разходи

сух

комфорт

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението