сравнение: Goodride Solmax 1 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin Primacy 4+ срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Goodride

Solmax 1

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Solmax 1

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 4+

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Брой тестове

1

3

13

6

1

3

Best position

#8

#2

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

8.0

3.3

4.3

4.7

1.0

3.7

най-нов тест

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

налични размери

46

40

123

146

64

34

мокър

Goodride Solmax 1

49%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Goodride Solmax 1

46%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

мокра обработка

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

аквапланинг - кръст

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

спиране на мокра настилка

Goodride Solmax 1

35%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Goodride Solmax 1

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

разходи

Goodride Solmax 1

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Goodride Solmax 1

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

пробег

Goodride Solmax 1

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

комфорт

Goodride Solmax 1

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

комфорт

Goodride Solmax 1

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

външен шум

Goodride Solmax 1

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

сух

Goodride Solmax 1

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

сухо спиране

Goodride Solmax 1

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

обработка в сухо състояние

Goodride Solmax 1

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Goodride Solmax 1 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Michelin Primacy 4+ срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Falken e.Ziex

Solmax 1

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 4+

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test profile

мокър

разходи

комфорт

сух

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението