сравнение: General Tire Grabber GT Plus срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Budget

General

Tire Grabber GT Plus

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Брой тестове

2

18

3

4

Best position

#9

#1

#2

#1

Average position

9.0

6.1

3.3

най-нов тест

2023

2024

2026

налични размери

64

47

40

60

—

мокър

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Завиване в мокър кръг

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

мокра обработка

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

аквапланинг - кръст

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

спиране на мокра настилка

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

офроуд

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

комфорт

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

външен шум

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

комфорт

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

81%

сух

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

сухо спиране

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

обработка в сухо състояние

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

разходи

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

съпротивление при търкаляне

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: General Tire Grabber GT Plus срещу. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo срещу. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

мокър

офроуд

комфорт

сух

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението