сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

висш среден клас

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Roadhawk

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Брой тестове

21

14

2

3

Best position

#2

#8

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

13.4

1.0

3.3

най-нов тест

2024

2026

2025

2026

налични размери

164

153

23

40

60

мокър

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

аквапланинг - кръст

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

мокра обработка

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

спиране на мокра настилка

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Завиване в мокър кръг

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

водач от мократа страна

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

сух

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

сухо спиране

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

обработка в сухо състояние

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

поведение при шофиране на сухо

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

външен шум

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

вътрешен шум

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

разходи

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

пробег

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

цена/стойност

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk срещу. BFGoodrich Advantage срещу. Continental UltraContact NXT срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението