сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

висш среден клас

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

ION Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.7

R17 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Брой тестове

6

1

3

Best position

#3

#1

Average position

4.7

1.0

4.0

най-нов тест

2026

2025

2026

налични размери

146

64

54

мокър

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

аквапланинг - надлъжен

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

спиране на мокра настилка

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

мокра обработка

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

аквапланинг - кръст

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

сух

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

сухо спиране

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

обработка в сухо състояние

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

комфорт

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

външен шум

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

разходи

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

съпротивление при търкаляне

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo срещу. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Test profile

мокър

сух

комфорт

разходи

размери и цени

добавете към сравнението