3 Shops · 0+ Products
GUMILAB.EU

сравнение: Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. Continental PremiumContact 6 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Falken e.Ziex срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Firestone Roadhawk 2висш среден клас
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.Ziexвисш среден клас
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
6
36
3
3
1
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
4.7
3.1
3.3
3.7
1.0
най-нов тест
2026
2023
2026
2025
2025
налични размери
146
296
40
34
64

мокър

мокър
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
мокра обработка
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
аквапланинг - кръст
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
спиране на мокра настилка
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
мокро сцепление
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

сух

сух
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Сухо представяне
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
смяна на лентата на движение на сухо
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

разходи

разходи
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
цена/стойност
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
пробег
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

комфорт

комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
комфорт
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
външен шум
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение