3 Shops · 0+ Products
GUMILAB.EU

сравнение: Continental PremiumContact 6 срещу. Firestone Roadhawk 2 срещу. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 срещу. Hankook ION Evo

Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2висш среден клас
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Брой тестове
36
6
3
1
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
3.1
4.7
3.3
1.0
най-нов тест
2023
2026
2026
2025
налични размери
296
146
40
64

мокър

мокър
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
аквапланинг - надлъжен
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
спиране на мокра настилка
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
аквапланинг - кръст
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
мокра обработка
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Завиване в мокър кръг
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
водач от мократа страна
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
мокро сцепление
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

сух

сух
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
сухо спиране
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
обработка в сухо състояние
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
поведение при шофиране на сухо
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
реакция на сухо управление
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
смяна на лентата на движение на сухо
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Сухо представяне
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

комфорт

комфорт
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
външен шум
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
комфорт
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
вътрешен шум
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

офроуд

офроуд
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%

разходи

разходи
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
съпротивление при търкаляне
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
пробег
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
горивна ефективност
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
цена/стойност
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

размери и цени

сравнете цените за всички налични размери на тези гуми.

добавете към сравнението

Popular brands
ново сравнение